GLS interpretation (method, software, tracking quality, load) ☆ Classifies LV GLS against the 2025 consensus partition and qualifies the reading by tracking method, vendor/software comparability, tracking quality and loading context.
Tracking method — Midwall / full-wall (preferred) Endocardial Not stated Comparison basis — Same vendor and software version as the comparison study Different vendor from the comparison study Vendor-independent software No comparison study Tracking quality — All segments tracked adequately Up to three uninterpretable segments excluded More than three segments uninterpretable Loading context — Usual loading, normal rhythm Augmented preload / reduced volumetric afterload (AR, TR, primary MR) Extremes of blood pressure Atrial fibrillation Enter Global longitudinal strain to calculate.
Show formula and assumptions Copy result
Quick tool: no study or demographics required. Values entered here are shared with other tools in this tab until New study.
